pvary commented on code in PR #15151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15151#discussion_r2816039700


##########
flink/v2.1/flink/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/flink/maintenance/operator/BaseCoordinator.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,325 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.iceberg.flink.maintenance.operator;
+
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Locale;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
+import java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList;
+import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
+import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
+import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
+import java.util.function.Consumer;
+import javax.annotation.Nonnull;
+import org.apache.flink.annotation.Internal;
+import org.apache.flink.annotation.VisibleForTesting;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.operators.coordination.OperatorCoordinator;
+import org.apache.flink.util.ExceptionUtils;
+import org.apache.flink.util.FatalExitExceptionHandler;
+import org.apache.flink.util.FlinkRuntimeException;
+import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.base.Preconditions;
+import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.Maps;
+import org.slf4j.Logger;
+import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
+
+/**
+ * Base coordinator for table maintenance operators. Provides common 
functionality for thread
+ * management, subtask gateway management, and checkpoint handling.
+ */
+@Internal
+public abstract class BaseCoordinator implements OperatorCoordinator {
+
+  private static final Logger LOG = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(BaseCoordinator.class);
+
+  private final String operatorName;
+  private final Context context;
+
+  private final ExecutorService coordinatorExecutor;
+  private boolean started;
+  private final CoordinatorExecutorThreadFactory coordinatorThreadFactory;
+  private final SubtaskGateways subtaskGateways;
+  protected static final Map<String, Consumer<LockReleaseEvent>> 
LOCK_RELEASE_CONSUMERS =
+      Maps.newConcurrentMap();
+  protected static final List<LockReleaseEvent> PENDING_RELEASE_EVENTS =
+      new CopyOnWriteArrayList<>();
+
+  protected BaseCoordinator(String operatorName, Context context) {
+    this.operatorName = operatorName;
+    this.context = context;
+
+    this.coordinatorThreadFactory =
+        new CoordinatorExecutorThreadFactory(
+            "Coordinator-" + operatorName, context.getUserCodeClassloader());
+    this.coordinatorExecutor = 
Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor(coordinatorThreadFactory);
+    this.subtaskGateways = new SubtaskGateways(operatorName, 
context.currentParallelism());
+    LOG.info("Created coordinator: {}", operatorName);
+  }
+
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  void handleReleaseLock(LockReleaseEvent lockReleaseEvent) {

Review Comment:
   Why do we have the `handleReleaseLock` in the Base, but the register in the 
TMCoordinator?
   
   My first instinct would be have the `handleReleaseLock` in the 
LRCoordinator, and the `registerLock` (which maybe should be 
`handleRegisterLock` for consistency) in the TMCoordinator.
   
   My second thought is that maybe we should keep both of them here, because of 
the locking magic, so the logic is in one place. I would leave it to you guys, 
but please be consistent 😄 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to