khjoshi94 commented on PR #15474: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/15474#issuecomment-3991534188
@RussellSpitzer Thanks for your response again. I understand the concern about adding a full standalone section. My main goal was to surface this behavior because it may be a source of confusion when users hit unexpected pruning results due to whitespace in partition values. I’m happy to reduce this to a short note or warning callout within the existing partitioning page instead of a full section if that fits better with the style of the docs. Something like: > "Note: Iceberg preserves string partition values exactly as written, including leading or trailing whitespace. Engines use strict equality for pruning, so ingestion pipelines should canonicalize values to avoid unexpected pruning." And if you still feel it doesn’t belong in the main docs even in a smaller form, I can close this out and publish it as a blog post instead. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
