glesperance commented on PR #2822: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/2822#issuecomment-4625496614
@moomindani I largely stepped back from the initiative because progress on the pieces I was interested in seemed quite slow from my perspective. My reading of the repository activity is that development is increasingly happening in iceberg-rust, and my assumption is that this is where a lot of future Iceberg-related work will land. I may be missing some context, or perhaps decisions are being discussed elsewhere, but from the repository alone it's difficult for me to understand why the PRs were closed and what the current roadmap is. The move towards v3 has been ongoing for over a year now (https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/issues/1818), so I'll let others form their own view on the pace of that effort. Personally, the current rate of progress gives me some concern, and it's caused me to evaluate other options for my long-term data lake format choice. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
