wgtmac commented on issue #799: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/issues/799#issuecomment-4861651417
Thanks for taking this initiative! Let me reply one by one. > Is conda-forge acceptable as a source of prebuilt Arrow in CI, and how would you want the version pin maintained? I think `conda-forge` or any other popular alternative is acceptable if we can cut down the build time significantly and is **easy to maintain**. > Single flavor on the test legs: which one, and is it enough to keep one leg building both static and shared? I would be in favor of building shared only in most CIs but we still have something to fix like https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/pull/337 > Windows on Debug: fine, or should the matrix keep a Release leg? Windows CI only has a Release build because of an unresolved issue: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-cpp/issues/39. It would be good if we can fix this and use a Debug build instead. > Any concerns with the composite action or the push trigger scoping? That sounds perfect to me. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
