Revanth14 commented on PR #1494: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/1494#issuecomment-5012643230
> Mechanics are solid — this drives the real planning client, not a stub. The gap is coverage: the fake already models the fetch-path 404s but skips a few production error paths it's built to exercise. Details inline. @tanmayrauth Thanks for the review. I’ve addressed the inline coverage gaps by adding tests for terminal planning statuses, plan-submission 404 mappings, and config-provided prefix routing. Let me know if any changes needed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
