fallintoplace commented on code in PR #1801:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-go/pull/1801#discussion_r3798004141


##########
table/metadata.go:
##########
@@ -596,20 +596,31 @@ func (b *MetadataBuilder) NextRowID() int64 {
 }
 
 func (b *MetadataBuilder) RemoveSnapshots(snapshotIds []int64, postCommit 
bool) error {
-       if b.currentSnapshotID != nil && slices.Contains(snapshotIds, 
*b.currentSnapshotID) {
-               return errors.New("current snapshot cannot be removed")
+       removedIDs := make(map[int64]struct{}, len(snapshotIds))
+       for _, snapshotID := range snapshotIds {
+               removedIDs[snapshotID] = struct{}{}
+       }
+
+       if b.currentSnapshotID != nil {
+               if _, ok := removedIDs[*b.currentSnapshotID]; ok {
+                       return errors.New("current snapshot cannot be removed")
+               }
        }
 
        b.snapshotList = slices.DeleteFunc(b.snapshotList, func(e Snapshot) 
bool {
-               return slices.Contains(snapshotIds, e.SnapshotID)
-       })
-       b.snapshotLog = slices.DeleteFunc(b.snapshotLog, func(e 
SnapshotLogEntry) bool {
-               return slices.Contains(snapshotIds, e.SnapshotID)
+               _, ok := removedIDs[e.SnapshotID]
+
+               return ok
        })

Review Comment:
   That delay is intentional: the pruning logic needs to see the removed entry 
so it can preserve the correct snapshot-history gap behavior. 
   
   The new regression test explicitly verifies that the builder is unchanged 
before Build(), then the final metadata log is pruned.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to