laskoviymishka commented on issue #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-verification/issues/8#issuecomment-5700182604
i think this makes sense. what i'd add is a set of fuzz tests that combine all possible read restrictions with their expected result - basically enumerate every action x type combo plus the must-fail cases, and keep each one as a pure input->output artifact. and frankly the main consumer here is not the iceberg libraries but the engines that actually execute these rules (spark, trino, flink...), so we should package the fixtures so an engine can just apply them and compare. @singhpk234 - any ideas what we should add here aswell? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
