RussellSpitzer commented on a change in pull request #2466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2466#discussion_r612652118
##########
File path: spark3/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/source/SparkWrite.java
##########
@@ -368,6 +374,23 @@ private void commitWithSnapshotIsolation(OverwriteFiles
overwriteFiles,
}
}
+ private class CompactionWrite extends BaseBatchWrite {
+ private final String jobID;
+
+ private CompactionWrite(String jobID) {
+ this.jobID = jobID;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void commit(WriterCommitMessage[] messages) {
+ List<DataFile> newDataFiles =
Lists.newArrayListWithExpectedSize(messages.length);
+ for (DataFile file : files(messages)) {
+ newDataFiles.add(file);
+ }
+ DataCompactionJobCoordinator.commitJob(table, jobID, newDataFiles);
Review comment:
DCJC would still need to return the files or the compaction action
wouldn't know what actually changed, which I think we want to still expose? I
also feel like we want to have logging kind of like I put in the prototype
which exposes where in a general Action you are which requires knowing which
Id's are part of a particular action in the DCJC?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
