rdblue commented on issue #2481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/2481#issuecomment-846299193


   For this use case, we may want to consider adding git-like branches and tags 
instead. I think it would be cleaner to branch and then update the branch. Then 
you'd be able to stay within a table and reuse data files more cleanly. Sharing 
files across independent tables has a lot of problems.
   
   That would also have a cleaner syntax: `catalog.db.table.branch`. That would 
prevent us from using some branch names, like `files` but I think overall it 
would be okay.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to