jackye1995 commented on a change in pull request #2688: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/2688#discussion_r654960523
########## File path: aws/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/aws/dynamodb/DynamoDbCatalog.java ########## @@ -0,0 +1,613 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.iceberg.aws.dynamodb; + +import java.io.Closeable; +import java.io.IOException; +import java.util.List; +import java.util.Map; +import java.util.Set; +import java.util.UUID; +import java.util.stream.Collectors; +import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configurable; +import org.apache.hadoop.conf.Configuration; +import org.apache.iceberg.BaseMetastoreCatalog; +import org.apache.iceberg.CatalogProperties; +import org.apache.iceberg.CatalogUtil; +import org.apache.iceberg.TableMetadata; +import org.apache.iceberg.TableOperations; +import org.apache.iceberg.aws.AwsClientFactories; +import org.apache.iceberg.aws.AwsProperties; +import org.apache.iceberg.aws.s3.S3FileIO; +import org.apache.iceberg.catalog.Namespace; +import org.apache.iceberg.catalog.SupportsNamespaces; +import org.apache.iceberg.catalog.TableIdentifier; +import org.apache.iceberg.exceptions.AlreadyExistsException; +import org.apache.iceberg.exceptions.NamespaceNotEmptyException; +import org.apache.iceberg.exceptions.NoSuchNamespaceException; +import org.apache.iceberg.exceptions.NoSuchTableException; +import org.apache.iceberg.exceptions.ValidationException; +import org.apache.iceberg.io.FileIO; +import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting; +import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.base.Joiner; +import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.base.Preconditions; +import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMap; +import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.Lists; +import org.apache.iceberg.relocated.com.google.common.collect.Maps; +import org.apache.iceberg.util.Tasks; +import org.slf4j.Logger; +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.DynamoDbClient; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.AttributeDefinition; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.AttributeValue; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.BillingMode; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.ConditionalCheckFailedException; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.CreateTableRequest; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.Delete; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.DeleteItemRequest; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.DescribeTableRequest; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.DescribeTableResponse; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.GetItemRequest; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.GetItemResponse; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.GlobalSecondaryIndex; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.KeySchemaElement; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.KeyType; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.Projection; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.ProjectionType; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.Put; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.PutItemRequest; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.QueryRequest; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.QueryResponse; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.ResourceNotFoundException; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.ScalarAttributeType; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.TableStatus; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.TransactWriteItem; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.TransactWriteItemsRequest; +import software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.UpdateItemRequest; + +/** + * DynamoDB implementation of Iceberg catalog + */ +public class DynamoDbCatalog extends BaseMetastoreCatalog implements Closeable, SupportsNamespaces, Configurable { + + private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DynamoDbCatalog.class); + private static final int CATALOG_TABLE_CREATION_WAIT_ATTEMPTS_MAX = 5; + static final Joiner COMMA = Joiner.on(','); + + private static final String GSI_NAMESPACE_IDENTIFIER = "namespace-identifier"; + private static final String COL_IDENTIFIER = "identifier"; + private static final String COL_IDENTIFIER_NAMESPACE = "NAMESPACE"; + private static final String COL_NAMESPACE = "namespace"; + private static final String PROPERTY_COL_PREFIX = "p."; Review comment: > It's been a while since I've used DynamoDB, but it used to be that the console viewer would show all columns I see, yes in the console you still see all the available columns (it is based on the rows it scans in the first batch). The number of columns shown will be propotional to the number of properties that the user choose to add to the tables. > there's nothing specific that iceberg supports with the secondary index so it's somewhat external to the catalog implementation. I'm not fundamentally opposed, just trying to make sure we have good justification for taking this approach Yes totally agree, I think this is actually the most important reason we chose this approach, because it provides much more flexibility for users to extend based on this single solution, without the need for us to add any additional DynamoDB specific logic such as creating new GSIs in the future in open source. That will be much harder to do because it needs to add auto-migration logic to existing users which would potentially impact production performance. The functional benefit overweights the cost that the UI shows a few more columns in my perspective. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
