kbendick commented on pull request #3351: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3351#issuecomment-951371446
> > I’m hesitant to include this for 0.12.1 > > I didn't want to go this into 0.12.1 as well :) > > I'll try and take a look at those assumptions as well. Thanks for reviewing. So now that I'm seeing that Spark 3.2 is already using this version of Parquet, I have a lot less concern in general. Though we do use our own read path, so the assumptions are probably still good to check. Thanks for taking care of this @nastra! -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
