zpi1223 commented on pull request #3644: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3644#issuecomment-985155185
> Hi @zpi1223! Thanks for the PR. > > For your own information, If this is what I think you're talking about (that `MERGE INTO` is resolved by position), this has actually been fixed in Spark 3.2. > > I have some unit tests here demonstrating that `MERGE INTO` will do by name resolution starting with Spark 3.2: #3440 > > Of course, Spark 3.2 support won't be generally available until Iceberg 0.13.0 is released, but wanted to let you know. Hi @kbendick , Thank you very much for your prompt reply. I personally think that these two are not conflicting. First，You are talking about the realization of functions, and what I want to express in this PR is to add certain warning information at the document level, so that the description information on the official website can be more complete, so as not to cause misunderstandings and affect the use in actual production. Secondly，Because we misunderstood the first time we used it, it took a certain amount of time to use it correctly at the end. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
