kbendick commented on issue #3393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/3393#issuecomment-985746506


   > TBH, this fix is a really interesting story:
   > 
   > * No Iceberg change is needed - this is clearly a Hive issue.
   > * In Hive master we are phasing out MR, and only Tez is supported (the 
issue does not happen with Tez)
   > * Even the tests are lame for the fix as we need to insert the data with 
Tez (MR is not supported with Iceberg), but the query should be run with MR to 
find the issue.
   > * To be correctly backported the change should be rebased to Hive 
branch-2.3, branch-2, branch-3 and branch 3.1. The issue is that the tests will 
not work for these branches as Iceberg is not supported there.
   > 
   > I have serious number of other tasks. I have found the issue and put the 
solution upstream, so if someone faces this they can fix it, but sadly I did 
not have time to follow up with a solution which could be released. I hope the 
affected ones will find it here, and if someone has time to backport the fixes, 
I am happy to review and push.
   > 
   > Thanks, Peter
   
   Thanks for the deep dive @pvary! I think it’s fair to leave as is, and if 
somebody is really affected they can pick up the issue or apply the necessary 
patch in their fork.
   
   This also begs the question: should we be running MR in the unit tests in 
this repo? How many users are using MR vs Tez for the limited amount of 
functionality that is supported?
   
   It’s also good to remove from the 0.13.0 milestone, as there’s nothing we 
can do about it here.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to