openinx commented on pull request #3270:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3270#issuecomment-987700662


   > For example, AWS EMR maintains its own AWS SDK version and it's already in 
the java classpath, so user actually don't need to specify all those additional 
AWS SDK dependencies anyway, specifying it would potentially cause issue 
because of 2 SDK versions coexist
   
   The way that AWS EMR put all the common aws sdk dependencies into a common 
path and let all the upper layer components to refer them,  I think it handle 
the aws sdk conflict issue correctly.  In our Aliyun EMR,  we don't put all of 
the aliyun sdk into a common path and make all the components refer it, instead 
we guarantee all the upper components are using the same aliyun sdk version and 
packaging them into their specific components classpath.  Although those 
components are packaging the same versioned aliyun sdk and introduce the 
duplicated sdk jars, but they are using the same version, so in theory we can 
use anyone of them.
   
   Another difference from aliyun sdk is:  we aliyun don't publish the bundled 
aliyun sdk to aliyun users, so people have to choose their needed aliyun sdk 
jars and package them into a bundled jar by themself (if necessary).  I think 
most of the other vendors choose this approach. So that's why I proposed the 
plugin approach.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to