aokolnychyi commented on a change in pull request #3970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3970#discussion_r791309502
##########
File path:
spark/v3.2/spark/src/test/java/org/apache/iceberg/spark/TestSparkDistributionAndOrderingUtil.java
##########
@@ -1300,6 +1300,202 @@ public void
testRangeCopyOnWriteMergePartitionedSortedTable() {
checkCopyOnWriteDistributionAndOrdering(table, MERGE,
expectedDistribution, expectedOrdering);
}
+ //
===================================================================================
+ // Distribution and ordering for merge-on-read DELETE operations with
position deletes
+ //
===================================================================================
+ //
+ // UNPARTITIONED
+ // -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ // delete mode is NOT SET -> ORDER BY _spec_id, _partition, _file, _pos
+ // delete mode is NONE -> unspecified distribution + LOCALLY ORDER BY
_spec_id, _partition, _file, _pos
+ // delete mode is HASH -> unspecified distribution + LOCALLY ORDER BY
_spec_id, _partition, _file, _pos
Review comment:
We may allow `HASH` even if the current spec is unpartitioned but there
are multiple specs.
I am not sure, though. Thoughts?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
