aokolnychyi commented on a change in pull request #3992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3992#discussion_r793983226



##########
File path: 
spark/v3.2/spark-extensions/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/v2/MergeRowsExec.scala
##########
@@ -46,6 +48,16 @@ case class MergeRowsExec(
     output: Seq[Attribute],
     child: SparkPlan) extends UnaryExecNode {
 
+  override def requiredChildOrdering: Seq[Seq[SortOrder]] = {
+    // request a local sort by the row ID attrs if shuffle hash joins are 
enabled
+    // this is needed to co-locate matches for the same target row after the 
shuffle
+    if (performCardinalityCheck && !conf.preferSortMergeJoin) {

Review comment:
       I checked AQE and I think it would be safer for us to always request a 
local sort. In many cases, the incoming records would be implicitly sorted so 
it shouldn't be too expensive.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@iceberg.apache.org

Reply via email to