jackye1995 commented on a change in pull request #27:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-docs/pull/27#discussion_r801097370
##########
File path: landing-page/content/common/releases/release-notes.md
##########
@@ -25,14 +25,18 @@ url: releases
The latest version of Iceberg is [{{% icebergVersion
%}}](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/releases/tag/apache-iceberg-{{%
icebergVersion %}}).
* [{{% icebergVersion %}} source
tar.gz](https://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/iceberg/apache-iceberg-{{%
icebergVersion %}}/apache-iceberg-{{% icebergVersion %}}.tar.gz) --
[signature](https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/apache-iceberg-{{%
icebergVersion %}}/apache-iceberg-{{% icebergVersion %}}.tar.gz.asc) --
[sha512](https://downloads.apache.org/iceberg/apache-iceberg-{{% icebergVersion
%}}/apache-iceberg-{{% icebergVersion %}}.tar.gz.sha512)
+* [{{% icebergVersion %}} Spark 3.2 runtime
Jar](https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/apache/iceberg/iceberg-spark-runtime-3.2_2.12/{{%
icebergVersion %}}/iceberg-spark-runtime-3.2_2.12-{{% icebergVersion %}}.jar)
+* [{{% icebergVersion %}} Spark 3.1 runtime
Jar](https://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/apache/iceberg/iceberg-spark-runtime-3.1_2.12/{{%
icebergVersion %}}/iceberg-spark-runtime-3.1_2.12-{{% icebergVersion %}}.jar)
Review comment:
I don't know how important it is to keep backwards compatibility for jar
names, but for now it seems that we are trying to keep 3.0 and 2.4 with old
names. Any thoughts? @rdblue
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
