stevenzwu commented on pull request #4117: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4117#issuecomment-1043357445
@openinx read the javadoc that you linked. seems that notifyCheckpointComplete can be skipped due to best effort. it also said that the notification can't be assumed for the latest snapshot. But it didn't say if they can come out of order. so the scenario could be ``` snapshotState(ckpt1); // notifyCheckpointComplete(ckpt1); (missed) snapshotState(ckpt2); notifyCheckpointComplete(ckpt2); ``` Agree that precise control on the source could be the right solution here. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
