RussellSpitzer commented on code in PR #4301:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4301#discussion_r858004222


##########
format/spec.md:
##########
@@ -194,6 +194,19 @@ Notes:
 For details on how to serialize a schema to JSON, see Appendix C.
 
 
+#### Default values
+
+Default values can be tracked for struct fields (both nested structs and the 
top-level schema's struct). There can be two defaults with a field:
+- `initial-default` is used to populate the field's value for all records that 
were written before the field was added to the schema
+- `write-default` is used to populate the field's value for any records 
written after the field was added to the schema, if the writer does not supply 
the field's value
+
+The `initial-default` is set only when a field is added to an existing schema. 
The `write-default` is initially set to the same value as `initial-default` and 
can be changed through schema evolution. If either default is not set for an 
optional field, then the default value is null for compatibility with older 
spec versions.
+
+Together, the `initial-default` and `write-default` produce SQL default value 
behavior without rewriting data files. That is, default value changes may only 
affect future records and all known fields are written into data files. To 
produce this behavior, omitting a known field when writing a data file is not 
allowed. The write default for a field must be written if a field is not 
supplied to a write. If the write default for a required field is not set, the 
writer must fail.

Review Comment:
   I think this is a bit confusing because of the ordering of sentences. 
Perhaps something like
   
   "The ANSI(?) SQL default value behavior treats a new column with a default 
value as if all previous rows missing that field now have the default value. 
The default is allowed to be changed for new writes but changing the default 
does not effect earlier writes. To achieve this behavior in Iceberg, omitting a 
known field when writing a new data file is never allowed. The write default 
must be used when writing any new files if a value for the default field is not 
provided. If the field is required and it is not supplied and there are is no 
default available, the write must fail."
   
   I'm a little confused on allowing the default for required fields and then 
allowing writers not to supply them. Isn't this supposed to be behavior for an 
Optional field which has not been set? Maybe an example on the difference 
between an Optional field with a write default and a required field with a 
write default? Sorry if I missed this discussion but I'm a little confused on 
the difference between Optional w/Default and Required w/Default



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to