kbendick commented on PR #4569: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/4569#issuecomment-1124580527
Yes, at first glance I do think they both should be backported. The release manager is @nastra fyi, but I personally think if people are encountering this and it’s an obvious bug, we backport it. I’d personally also like to see #3411 backported, as I’ve recently encountered issues on partition summaries using the void transform (which could be unrelated to both as I need to take a closer look): https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/4689 But if it’s ready I don’t see why not. Any ideas on a possible timeline for both? I know that’s highly dependent on things you can’t control, but we’ve admittedly delayed 0.13.2 for quite some time. TLDR - On first pass I would think to include both. But I do have some concerns around holding up the release too much. I’ll spend time on a proper pass over this tomorrow :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
