kbendick commented on issue #4997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/4997#issuecomment-1150673172

   Also, Iceberg does have partition evolution. You could consider updating the 
partition schema to use a proper date going forward. Given that Iceberg’s 
partitioning is hidden, it could potentially be done in a way that is abstract 
to end users for things going forward.
   
   But I would suggest looking into the changes you’ve made to your Spark 
distribution as well as the behavior in OSS spark.
   
   And if possible closing this issue and linking to it from a new issue when 
you’ve gathered more info, as the issue title is somewhat misleading now imo 
and we’re also emailing a number of people by still using this issue. I’ll 
leave that choice up to you. 🙂 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to