singhpk234 commented on issue #5779: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/5779#issuecomment-1251952574
yes, if you map both the bucket (present in different region) to a multi-region access-point. can ref to this slack thread as well, where this idea originated : https://apache-iceberg.slack.com/archives/C025PH0G1D4/p1645066803099319 > Reigon1 meta data will be replaced by mybuket1 actual pointer of s3 in metadata Region2 meta data will be replaced by mybuket2 actual pointer of s3 in metadata No, Let's say your table path is under `mybucket1` so both mybucket1 in region1 and mybucket2 and region2 will have paths of `mybucket1`, inside the metadata files. It just at the time of S3 (GET / PUT) call we will replace mybucket1 reference with multi-region access point. Now if you can use both a mutli-region access-point pointing to mybucket1, and mybucket2. it acts a proxy and single global hostname between two and internally routes the request to location with lowest latency... More about access-points here https://aws.amazon.com/s3/features/multi-region-access-points/ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
