jackye1995 commented on issue #7071: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/7071#issuecomment-1464486193
thanks for bringing this up! Yes I remember we briefly discussed this in a past community sync. cc @danielcweeks @rdblue I am sure this is going to help with the case where people do not set default at all, and we can dynamically reduce target file size to increase utilization of worker nodes. But people can technically do that by setting `read.split.target-size` to customize for each table, and I think they should do that. But that goes to the realm of auto-optimization. I am interested to know what other people think. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
