RussellSpitzer commented on issue #7192: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/7192#issuecomment-1483230333
I would argue for your use case you should always just have all the columns in your iceberg table. Keeping around data that doesn't actually belong to the table seems a bit messy. I think it would also complicate schema evolution since these other columns would not have guaranteed field ids. H -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
