singhpk234 commented on PR #7391:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7391#issuecomment-1517230277

   Have added java 17 CI for all engine's as well, as part of commit 
[1bc99b8](https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7391/commits/1bc99b805afe823604d9058b632af3135b3b5d1f),
 except Flink couldn't find minimum flink version since when java 17 is 
supported, found this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15736, 
but it seems un-resolved (cc @stevenzwu, who might have more context here)
   
   ---
   
   This has now added new CI's, i proposed idea a while back to reduce the load 
on main iceberg repo here 
(https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/5153#issuecomment-1179510026)  : 
   The idea is based on apache spark : 
   ```
   This is what Apache Spark does presently :
   
       We create a PR and our repository triggers the workflow. Our PR uses the 
resources allocated to us for testing.
       Apache Spark repository finds our workflow, and links it in a comment in 
our PR
   ```
   
   We can do the same for iceberg, i.e run ci on our fork and iceberg just 
finds the run and attaches the workflow to our pr in iceberg repo. 
   
   As per spark folks : 
   
   ```
   Spark was one of the projects that uses the GitHub resources most in ASF, 
and now it's one of the lowest after this change :-).
   ```
   
   Happy to create a pr to do same for iceberg. 
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to