szehon-ho commented on code in PR #7581:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7581#discussion_r1201717572
##########
core/src/main/java/org/apache/iceberg/PartitionsTable.java:
##########
@@ -47,6 +47,16 @@ public class PartitionsTable extends BaseMetadataTable {
new Schema(
Types.NestedField.required(1, "partition",
Partitioning.partitionType(table)),
Types.NestedField.required(4, "spec_id", Types.IntegerType.get()),
+ Types.NestedField.required(
+ 9,
+ "last_updated_at",
+ Types.TimestampType.withZone(),
+ "Partition last updated timestamp"),
+ Types.NestedField.required(
+ 10,
+ "last_updated_snapshot_id",
Review Comment:
Hm, what do we think to have both? (and null if its expired, as per
discussion here
https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7581#discussion_r1201257740). If we
have it, I feel its more useful than the time, but agree we don't always have
it.
I think sequence number will be good too, but do we mean fileSequenceNumber
or dataSequenceNumber. Maybe worth another pr if there's more discussion there?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
