XN137 opened a new issue, #7819: URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/issues/7819
as part of https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/7818 i had rebased my iceberg fork through the github UI and noticed that a lot of (expensive?) GH workflows were triggered due to the "new commit" on `master`:  while i see the value this provides for the `apache/iceberg` repo it seems to me like wasted resources to also do this for forks, because usually the commits that make it to the `master` branch on a fork were already thoroughly tested by the GH workflows on `apache/iceberg`. so my suggestion would be to also add `if: github.repository_owner == 'apache'` to those workflows and not run them on forks - thoughts ? in the rare case where individual devs actually maintain a development line that is somewhat separate from `master` on `apache/iceberg` they are free to adjust their workflows accordingly on their fork. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
