[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pavel Tupitsyn updated IGNITE-1652:
------------------------------------
Description:
{code}
cache.WithAsync().Get();
var future = cache.GetFuture();
{code}
should become
{code}
var future = cache.GetAsync();
{code}
See if we can make ToTask() more efficient, or even get rid of Futures
completely in favor of tasks, preserving performance.
First step is .Net-only (remove GetFuture from public API, call it inside
*Async methods). This requires 2 JNI calls.
Later we should look into making it a single JNI call.
was:
{code}
cache.WithAsync().Get();
var future = cache.GetFuture();
{code}
should become
{code}
var future = cache.GetAsync();
{code}
First step is .Net-only (remove GetFuture from public API, call it inside
*Async methods). This requires 2 JNI calls.
Later we should look into making it a single JNI call.
> .Net: Rework async APIs (remove WithAsync/GetFuture)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-1652
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1652
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: interop
> Affects Versions: 1.5
> Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> {code}
> cache.WithAsync().Get();
> var future = cache.GetFuture();
> {code}
> should become
> {code}
> var future = cache.GetAsync();
> {code}
> See if we can make ToTask() more efficient, or even get rid of Futures
> completely in favor of tasks, preserving performance.
> First step is .Net-only (remove GetFuture from public API, call it inside
> *Async methods). This requires 2 JNI calls.
> Later we should look into making it a single JNI call.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
