[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14982287#comment-14982287
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-1768:
----------------------------------------

GitHub user ptupitsyn opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/187

    IGNITE-1768 .Net: Review portable configuration on Java side.

    

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ptupitsyn/ignite ignite-1768

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/187.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #187
    
----
commit 7bf8002cc1d8caafd5813314fbedb35480321074
Author: Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com>
Date:   2015-10-30T09:56:04Z

    remove assemblyName from C#

commit 0853528cd2ba934cbf85590df99dad27291a50a9
Author: Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com>
Date:   2015-10-30T10:06:27Z

    IGNITE-1768 .Net: Review portable configuration on Java side - remove 
AssemblyName

commit 9f14d7a51be12dec2f69ac315fc0f54561958bf1
Author: Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com>
Date:   2015-10-30T10:10:19Z

    Fixing test configs

commit d74a41d17e3a046ed1bfd4cbc0cf5a145796eff3
Author: Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@gridgain.com>
Date:   2015-10-30T10:13:00Z

    IGNITE-1768 .Net: Review portable configuration on Java side - remove 
AssemblyName

----


> .Net: Review portable configuration on Java side.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-1768
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1768
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: interop
>    Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>            Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
>            Assignee: Pavel  Tupitsyn
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> I am concerned why for some objects we pass assembly + type, while for others 
> type only.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to