[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15134354#comment-15134354
]
Pavel Tupitsyn edited comment on IGNITE-1563 at 2/5/16 3:52 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
1) I was wrong. Batch size does not incur network trips. It is a direct field
write in Java, same as DataStreamer properties. This fits guidelines quite well.
I was thinking about turning read/write pair into a property, and this
certainly is not correct. But BatchSize should be a property, fixed.
was (Author: ptupitsyn):
1) I was wrong. Batch size does not incur network trips. It is a direct field
write in Java, same as DataStreamer properties. This fits guidelines quite well.
I was thinking about turning read/write pair into a property, and this
certainly is not correct. But BatchSize should be a property, fixed.
Same with IsClosed, can be a property. But we have already released AtomicLong,
where IsClosed is a method. I think we should deprecate it and add a property.
> .Net: Implement "atomic" data structures.
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-1563
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1563
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: platforms
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0.final
> Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> This includes:
> atomicSequence;
> atomicStamped;
> atomicReference
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
