[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15138887#comment-15138887
 ] 

Alexey Goncharuk commented on IGNITE-2509:
------------------------------------------

I believe the behavior should be as follows:
 * ONHEAP_TIERED, 50 entries on-heap, 50 entries off-heap. Then size(ONHEAP) == 
50, size(OFFHEAP) == 50, offheapAllocatedSize() > 0
 * OFFHEAP_TIERED, 100 entries offheap. Then size(ONHEAP) == 0, size(OFFHEAP) 
== 100, offheapAllocatedSize() > 0
 * OFFHEAP_VALUES, 100 entries onheap. Then size(ONHEAP) == 100, size(OFFHEAP) 
== 0, offheapAllocatedSize() > 0

> Broken eviction and metrics for OFFHEAP_VALUES cache mode
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-2509
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2509
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0.final
>            Reporter: Denis Magda
>            Assignee: Vladimir Ershov
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.6
>
>         Attachments: EvictionBug.java, eviction_fix.patch
>
>
> In case when {{OFFHEAP_VALUES}} mode is used {{EvictionPolicy}} calculates 
> values size wrongly which leads to the fact that data is evicted only when 
> either the limit on number of entries is reached or size of keys is bigger 
> than max allowed size.
> To reproduce set the following cache configuration
> {noformat}
>         FifoEvictionPolicy plc = new FifoEvictionPolicy();
>         plc.setMaxMemorySize(2 * 1024 * 1024);
>         cacheCfg.setEvictionPolicy(plc);
>         cacheCfg.setMemoryMode(CacheMemoryMode.OFFHEAP_VALUES);
>         cacheCfg.setSwapEnabled(true);
> {noformat}
> Test that reproduces the issue is attached.
> Also attached a patch that fixes the issue. However we should validate that 
> the fix is full and add additional tests to the test suites.
> Finally, {{cache.metrics().getOffHeapAllocatedSize()}} always returns 0 for 
> this cache mode. Has to be fixed as well.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to