[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17183143#comment-17183143
]
Vladislav Pyatkov commented on IGNITE-13265:
--------------------------------------------
[~ascherbakov] Would you look this again according to my comments?
> Historical iterator for atomic group should transfer few more rows than
> required
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-13265
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13265
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Vladislav Pyatkov
> Assignee: Vladislav Pyatkov
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> On a historical rebalance some updates move from one node to another wherein
> this update may have various order in nodes. Reordering can happen in smell
> interval, but it cannot avoid at all in current implementation atomic
> protocol.
> This mean we will reduce a probably of loosing update if we make a margin
> from initial counter for the historical iterator on atomic cache.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
