[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17186270#comment-17186270
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13383:
----------------------------------------

{panel:title=Branch: [pull/8184/head] Base: [master] : No blockers 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/8184/head] Base: [master] : No new tests 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All* 
Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=5566036&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]

> Java thin client improvements: channel reconnect and redundant concurrency 
> structures replacement.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-13383
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13383
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: thin client
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.1
>            Reporter: Stanilovsky Evgeny
>            Assignee: Stanilovsky Evgeny
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I found that  {code:java}ConcurrentHashMap{code} and 
> {code:java}AtomicLong{code} are redundant in java thin client code, yes i fix 
> tests a bit but i can`t see any contradictions with thick client behavior 
> here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to