[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15191324#comment-15191324
]
Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-2806:
-----------------------------------------
Note that in future we will probably avaluate other ideas, e.g. use of ATOMIC
cache. As such, it is worth considering use enum instead of boolean flag. On
the other hand, we can use boolean flag for simplicity for now, and deprecate
it in future if needed.
> IGFS: re-create lock relaxed version
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-2806
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2806
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: IGFS
> Affects Versions: 1.6
> Reporter: Ivan Veselovsky
> Assignee: Ivan Veselovsky
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> Earlier we had IGFS implementation that seemed to be fast, but was not
> absolutely correct in terms of synchronization logic. As now we suspect some
> problems with IGFS performance, we need to create such version of the
> implementation again.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
