[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17248872#comment-17248872
]
Kirill Tkalenko commented on IGNITE-12892:
------------------------------------------
Hi, [~shm]!
I think you can ask the release engineer to add this ticket to the
[release|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Apache+Ignite+2.9.1#ApacheIgnite2.9.1-2.9/2.9.1PerformanceComparison].
It seems to me that most likely the IGNITE-13373 fixed the problem you
indicated, I already made a description in the [PR's comment
|https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/8550#issuecomment-744032357].
> Clarify WAL archive size configuration
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-12892
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12892
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Semyon Danilov
> Assignee: Semyon Danilov
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.10
>
> Time Spent: 1h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Actual maximum size of WAL archive that can be reserved for historical
> rebalance is calculated as minimum of three properties:
> # DataStorageConfiguration#walHistSize (units: number of checkpoints)
> # DataStorageConfiguration#maxWalArchiveSize (units: bytes)
> # IgniteSystemProperties#IGNITE_PDS_MAX_CHECKPOINT_MEMORY_HISTORY_SIZE
> (units: number of checkpoints)
> The logic is a little unclear, so I propose following changes:
> # Stop using walHistSize at all (it's already deprecated) for WAL truncation
> # Use IGNITE_PDS_MAX_CHECKPOINT_MEMORY_HISTORY_SIZE only in case WAL archive
> is managed externally (so we limit the quantity of checkpoints stored in
> memory, but don't remove WAL files)
> # Use -1 for maxWalArchiveSize (instead of Long.MAX_VALUE) to disable WAL
> truncation
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
