[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17339540#comment-17339540
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-14675:
----------------------------------------

{panel:title=Branch: [pull/9079/head] Base: [master] : No blockers 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/9079/head] Base: [master] : No new tests 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All* 
Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=5994513&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]

> Refactor IgniteAuthenticationProcessor callbacks
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-14675
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14675
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mikhail Petrov
>            Assignee: Mikhail Petrov
>            Priority: Minor
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Since IgniteAuthenticationProcessor is not treated as a separate processor, 
> it is needed to refactor explicit IgniteAuthenticationProcessor callbacks  
> from other processors. Many of them can be eliminated. 
> For example onActivate method can be replaced with 
> PartitionsExchangeAware#onDoneBeforeTopologyUnlock
> Explicit onLocalJoin method call can be replaced with 
> discoMgr.localJoinFuture().listen(fut -> onLocalJoin());
> and so on. 
> It is also possible that this will require changing the startup order of the 
> IgniteAuthenticationProcessor.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to