[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nikolay Izhikov updated IGNITE-14700:
-------------------------------------
Description:
It seems that we may always use
{{walForceArchiveTimeout}} instead of {{walAutoArchiveAfterInactivity}},
because only guarantee user needs is "WAL records available in archive after
timeout".
This statement should be discussed on the dev-list to be sure we fully
understand all use-cases for {{walAutoArchiveAfterInactivity}}
was:
It seems that we may always use
{{walAutoArchiveAfterInactivity}} instead of {{walAutoArchiveAfterInactivity}},
because only guarantee user needs is "WAL records available in archive after
timeout".
This statement should be discussed on the dev-list to be sure we fully
understand all use-cases for {{walAutoArchiveAfterInactivity}}
> Use walForceArchiveTimeout instead of walAutoArchiveAfterInactivity
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-14700
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-14700
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Nikolay Izhikov
> Assignee: Nikolay Izhikov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: IEP-59
>
> It seems that we may always use
> {{walForceArchiveTimeout}} instead of {{walAutoArchiveAfterInactivity}},
> because only guarantee user needs is "WAL records available in archive after
> timeout".
> This statement should be discussed on the dev-list to be sure we fully
> understand all use-cases for {{walAutoArchiveAfterInactivity}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
