[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17426979#comment-17426979
]
Evgeny Stanilovsky commented on IGNITE-15714:
---------------------------------------------
1. It`s not right, check :
{noformat}
if (cachesCnt() <= 1)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Please configure cachesCount
param, need to be more that 1.");
{noformat}
2. Ok.
3. I see the one problem in such approach - if there is NO implicit tx`s and
bench highlights some deviations - bench runner knows the root of the problem
more precisely, otherwise runner got two point of potential problem (implicit
and explicit ways). So i prefer to make this bench only explicit and fill
additional ticket for mixed txs, the percent of implicit need to discussed too,
wdyt ?
4. Ok.
> Yardstick benchmark for multi cache transaction operations.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-15714
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15714
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: yardstick
> Reporter: Evgeny Stanilovsky
> Assignee: Evgeny Stanilovsky
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Seems we need additional yardstick test for multi cache transaction put
> operations.
> Need to be configured:
> 1. Count of caches per transaction.
> 2. Mixed implicit\explicit tx.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
