[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17430042#comment-17430042
]
Andrey Mashenkov commented on IGNITE-15443:
-------------------------------------------
[~aholod], the ticket is not in "in progress" state, do you intend to fix this?
BTW, the ticket is not about choosing the best-performed implementation, but
more about API.
We don't need hash maps size of 2^32 items (up to 64k, maybe sparsed) and don't
expect high contention here.
> Add Map with primitive keys implementations.
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-15443
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15443
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andrey Mashenkov
> Assignee: Anton Kholodkov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-3, newbie, perfomance
>
> There are a number of places where Map<Integer, Integer> and Map<Integer,
> Object> are used.
> Let's add an optimized Map with a primitive key (IntMap, IntIntMap) to the
> ignite-core module.
> Let's benchmark next candidates and choose one
> * IntMap from Ignite 2 with robinhood hashing.
> * FastUtils
> * Netty
> * OpenHFT
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
