[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17433611#comment-17433611
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-15807:
----------------------------------------

{panel:title=Branch: [pull/9522/head] Base: [master] : No blockers 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/9522/head] Base: [master] : No new tests 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All* 
Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=6238273&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]

> In case of port is absent in IgniteClient first of all try connect on default 
> port.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-15807
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15807
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: thin client
>            Reporter: Ilya Kazakov
>            Assignee: Ilya Kazakov
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Now if in ClientConfiguration address specified without port, client will try 
> to connect to default port range in random order. But often server listen on 
> default port. This random order leads to unexpected connection time.
> Will be better if firstly client will try to connect to default port, before 
> randomly scan all port range.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to