[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15239119#comment-15239119
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-2995:
----------------------------------------
GitHub user dkarachentsev opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/639
IGNITE-2995 - putAll() and removeAll() operations on transactional ca…
…che are very slow on big number of entries.
Test to reproduce the issue.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-2995
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/639.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #639
----
commit cb40cc7f36cbd135ea3a0a2a84eb64eba208219f
Author: dkarachentsev <[email protected]>
Date: 2016-04-13T11:58:40Z
IGNITE-2995 - putAll() and removeAll() operations on transactional cache
are very slow on big number of entries.
Test to reproduce the issue.
----
> putAll() and removeAll() operations on transactional cache are very slow on
> big number of entries
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-2995
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2995
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: cache
> Affects Versions: 1.5.0.final
> Reporter: Dmitry Karachentsev
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: performance
>
> Saving and removing 100_000 cache entries using putAll() and removeAll()
> methods is much slower than save/remove 10 times 10_000 entries. F.e. on my
> test environment second case (10_000 x 10) took 3 mins and first case
> (100_000) - 24 mins.
> That issue is observed only for transactional cache.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
