[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17463120#comment-17463120
]
Ivan Daschinsky edited comment on IGNITE-13464 at 12/21/21, 10:45 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[~RyzhovSV] [~sdarlington] Ignite zookeper depends on curator framework and use
good ole log4j 1.2.17. Removing log4j here is not an option. And I don't
understand why, because nothing related with log4j 2 hysteria
was (Author: ivandasch):
[~RyzhovSV] [~sdarlington] Ignite zookeper depends on curator framework and use
good ole log4j 1.7. Removing log4j here is not an option. And I don't
understand why, because nothing related with log4j 2 hysteria
> Ignite-rest-http, zookeeper modules includes vulnerable dependencies
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-13464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13464
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: rest
> Affects Versions: 2.9, 2.8.1
> Reporter: Stephen Darlington
> Assignee: Sergei Ryzhov
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.12
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The ignite-rest-http, zookeeper module includes a [vulnerable
> version|https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17571] of the log4j
> library. It also appears to include slf4j. Why does the REST API include its
> own logging libraries?
> This was spotted in 2.8.1 but still appears to be an issue in master and 2.9.
> More here:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/critical-security-vulnerability-for-opt-ignite-apache-ignite-libs-optional-ignite-rest-http-log4j-1-r-td34031.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
