[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17463350#comment-17463350
 ] 

Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-13464:
----------------------------------------

{panel:title=Branch: [pull/9676/head] Base: [master] : No blockers 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
{panel:title=Branch: [pull/9676/head] Base: [master] : No new tests 
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All* 
Results|https://ci2.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=6241548&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]

> Ignite-rest-http modules includes vulnerable dependencies
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-13464
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13464
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: rest
>    Affects Versions: 2.9, 2.8.1
>            Reporter: Stephen Darlington
>            Assignee: Sergei Ryzhov
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.12
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The ignite-rest-http module includes a [vulnerable 
> version|https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17571] of the log4j 
> library. It also appears to include slf4j. Why does the REST API include its 
> own logging libraries?
> This was spotted in 2.8.1 but still appears to be an issue in master and 2.9.
> More here:
> http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/critical-security-vulnerability-for-opt-ignite-apache-ignite-libs-optional-ignite-rest-http-log4j-1-r-td34031.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to