[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrey N. Gura updated IGNITE-17403:
------------------------------------
Labels: ignite-3 (was: )
> SQL "select by key" performance 50-60 times slower than key-value get
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-17403
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17403
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Kirill Gusakov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-3
>
> During the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17220 benchmarks runs
> we found out, that YCSB benchmarks show very slow performance.
> 1. After some investigations under
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17379 we found out, that SQL
> select by key performance significantly slower, than the same key-value get:
> 1-2ms vs 40-50ms.
> Step to reproduce:
> * clone branch
> [https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite-3/tree/ignite-17379]
> * run test ItBenchmarkTest#testYCSBLikeKV
> 2. Also, at the same time it looks like performance degradation depends on
> the size of table data
> Step to reproduce:
> * run the test ItBenchmarkTest#testReadDegradationSqlApi
>
> According to these points, it seems that the cause of these issues: "rocksdb
> full scan and post-filtering" pattern, which we are using in SQL API (fix me,
> if I'm wrong). You can check async-profile cpu flamegraph from the benchmarks
> run on my machine (RocksIterator#seek0 column, I guess)
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
