[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Evgeny Stanilovsky updated IGNITE-17434:
----------------------------------------
    Epic Link: IGNITE-15081

> Extend implicit sql transactions functionality for RO|RW transactions support.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-17434
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17434
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: sql
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha5
>            Reporter: Evgeny Stanilovsky
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>
> After [1] was implemented, there are some improvements seems still required:
> #  If no explicit tx is specified it`s possible to obtain situation when keys 
> from one bulk enlisted under different tx [2]
> # Implicit tx (not tx at all but tx meta - timestamp, first enlisted 
> partition and so on ..) need to be replicated into all calcite execution 
> fragments.
> Thus in [3] seems we need to start implicit tx if no explicit defined and 
> correctly process it in [4]
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17328
> [2] ModifyNode#flushTuples
> [3] ExecutionServiceImpl#executeQuery
> [4] DistributedQueryManager#execute



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to