[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17584980#comment-17584980
]
Roman Puchkovskiy commented on IGNITE-17574:
--------------------------------------------
The patch looks good to me
> AssertionError "According to the JRaft protocol ECATCHUP is expected" is
> thrown on reconfiguration error
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-17574
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17574
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Semyon Danilov
> Assignee: Semyon Danilov
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ignite-3
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> {noformat}
> java.lang.AssertionError: According to the JRaft protocol, ECATCHUP is
> expected
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.raft.RebalanceRaftGroupEventsListener.onReconfigurationError(RebalanceRaftGroupEventsListener.java:205)
> at
> java.base/java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.invokeWithArguments(MethodHandle.java:710)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.raft.RebalanceRaftGroupEventsListener.onReconfigurationError(RebalanceRaftGroupEventsListener.java:189)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.raft.jraft.core.NodeImpl$ConfigurationCtx.lambda$reset$0(NodeImpl.java:453)
> at org.apache.ignite.raft.jraft.util.Utils$1.run(Utils.java:161)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.testframework.util.DirectExecutor.submit(DirectExecutor.java:68)
> at org.apache.ignite.raft.jraft.util.Utils.runInThread(Utils.java:131)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.raft.jraft.util.Utils.runClosureInThread(Utils.java:158)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.raft.jraft.core.NodeImpl$ConfigurationCtx.reset(NodeImpl.java:459)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
