[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Valentin Kulichenko updated IGNITE-3164:
----------------------------------------
    Description: 
In some cases user can't guarantee that EP behaves consistently on all nodes. 
In transactional cache this can lead to inconsistent cache, because we invoke 
EP on both primary and backup nodes.

We can add {{withSendValueToBackup()}} flag (naming is arguable) which will 
override current default behavior.

We also need to update documentation, especially provide the explanation of EP 
behavior in atomic and transactional caches.

  was:
In some cases user can't guarantee that EP behaves consistently on all nodes. 
In transactional cache this can lead to inconsistent cache, because we invoke 
EP on both primary and backup nodes.

We can add {{withSendValueToBackup()}} flag (naming is arguable) which will 
override current default behavior.


> Add an option to send resulting value instead of entry processor in 
> transactional cache
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-3164
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3164
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: cache
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0.final
>            Reporter: Valentin Kulichenko
>            Assignee: Nikolay Tikhonov
>              Labels: important
>             Fix For: 1.7
>
>
> In some cases user can't guarantee that EP behaves consistently on all nodes. 
> In transactional cache this can lead to inconsistent cache, because we invoke 
> EP on both primary and backup nodes.
> We can add {{withSendValueToBackup()}} flag (naming is arguable) which will 
> override current default behavior.
> We also need to update documentation, especially provide the explanation of 
> EP behavior in atomic and transactional caches.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to