[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17619011#comment-17619011
 ] 

Anton Vinogradov commented on IGNITE-11611:
-------------------------------------------

[~ascherbakov] , such approach may/will cause data loss.

Partition copies with not a "most recent" data may contain a data missed at 
"most recent" data owner.

Correct fix is to rebalance entries between LWM and HWM using the historical 
rebalance as well when possible (see. IGNITE-17738 for details)

When historihal rebalance is not possible we must fix the data using the 
recovery tool (see. IGNITE-15167 for details)

> If partition consistency cannot be restored during rebalance using counters 
> the most recent partition data should be used.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-11611
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11611
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Alexey Scherbakov
>            Priority: Major
>
> This is possible if all owners are left, then returned and counters are 
> inconsistent (no dedicated max counter node)
> In such a case the "most recent" partition can be used for supplying purposes.
> We should track topology history to find the node with "most recent" updates.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to