[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Denis Chudov updated IGNITE-18192:
----------------------------------
    Epic Link:   (was: IGNITE-18042)

> Conditional lock
> ----------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-18192
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-18192
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Vladislav Pyatkov
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-3
>
> *Motivation:*
> According to transaction IEP [1], insert into non-unique sorted index happens 
> as follows:
> // insert
> - IX_short(nextKey)
> - X_commit(currentKey) if nextKey previously locked in S, X or SIX mode
> - IX_commit(currentKey) otherwise
> So in some cases we can acquire lock in weaker mode (IX instead of X ).
> To be able to do this, we need an API extension for LockManager: a method 
> which atomically does following actions:
> - checks a lock mode of a lock that is currently held on a key A 
> - selects a needed lock mode for key B
> - acquires lock for key B with selected mode.
> *Definition of done:*
> Added a method to LockManager:
> {{CompletableFuture<Lock> acquire(UUID txId, LockKey keyToLock, LockKey 
> keyToCheck, Function<LockMode, LockMode>);}}
> The function passed as a parameter, should accept the current lock mode on 
> key keyToCheck and return a lock mode that is supposed to be acquired by the 
> method for key keyToLock.
> *Implementation notes:*
> This method will have to synchronize on multiple keys in LockManager. We 
> should take into account that {{LockKey}} is not comparable and specify in 
> the method description that the keys passed into the method must be ordered 
> relying on index order to prevent deadlocks.
> [1] 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/IEP-91%3A+Transaction+protocol



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to