[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pavel Tupitsyn updated IGNITE-1654:
-----------------------------------
Labels: .net (was: )
> .Net: Ensure consistent "keepPortable" behavior.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-1654
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1654
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: platforms
> Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: .net
>
> We need to ensure that "keep portable" concept is
> a) Consistent;
> b) Exists for all logical units where it is necessary.
> Lets split "keep portable" behavior in two scenarios:
> 1) Client mode. This is when client (caller) operates on portable objects.
> Example: ICache<IPortableObject, IPortableObject>.Get(...);
> 2) Server mode. This is when some server side object (caller) operates on
> portable objects. Example: a remote service which should not deserialize
> passed arguments and operate on portables instead.
> Looks like both cases can be handled using the same "keep portable" flag on
> related logical unit.
> Logical units affected:
> 1) Compute - at the very least closures can be executed in this mode;
> 2) Cache;
> 3) Data streamer;
> 4) Data structures: atomic stamped, atmoc reference;
> 5) Cache events;
> 6) Messages;
> 7) Services.
> Probably we should introduce a kind of "IKeepPortableEnabled<T>" (or so)
> interface, which will have a method "T WithKeepPortable()". This way users
> will be able to easily understand that "keep portable" semantics is
> applicable.
> Lets split it into several children tickets if necessary.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
